|
Center Projects and Activities Identifying Impacts and Solutions Partners and Product Use
|
Coastal HazardsPartners and Product UseSee how products developed by the NOAA Coastal Services Center and its partners are being used to proactively manage potential impacts of coastal hazards.Partners' Products Coastal Hazards Information System (COHIS) In an effort to improve state coastal hazard response capability, NOAA's Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, in partnership with the Alabama and Georgia Coastal Zone Management Programs has developed a Coastal Hazards Information System (COHIS). The Arcview-based system uses GIS and Global Positioning System (GPS), to provide a unified and comprehensive pre-storm planning and post-storm damage assessment capability for coastal areas. Modeled after South Carolina's Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management and the NOAA Coastal Services Center Fellowship "Post-Hurricane Recovery Project", COHIS provides an additional interactive, internet-based ArcIMS mapping system. The effort was funded by a grant from NOAA's High Performance Computing and Communications Office. Community Vulnerability Assessment Methodology Use Statewide Hazard Risk and Vulnerability Assessment for the State of Rhode Island
John Shaughnessy
"The Community Vulnerability Assessment Tool Web site was sent to all of our Project Impact Community Hazard Mitigation Planners involved in All Hazards Mitigation Planning and communities involved in creating Flood Hazard Mitigation Plans under FEMA's Flood Mitigation Assistance Program. We recommend this tool to communities that are interested in performing vulnerability assessments and risk analyses as components of their Hazard Mitigation Plans and we have specifically included it as an appendix in a recent draft of our New Hampshire Community Hazard Mitigation Planning Guide." Peter Throop
"In the case of Keene, the Community Vulnerability Assessment Tool provided the inspiration for our thinking regarding how to prioritize potential mitigation projects. The actual approach we employed drew from the conceptual framework implied from the CVAT, and was then further developed to reflect our particular needs and circumstances. In the end what evolved was a weighted rating prioritization approach based on location specific criteria." |