Analyzing the Cost and Benefits of Human Activities for Indonesian Coral Reefs
Purpose of Study
Coral reefs in Indonesia have been depleting rapidly because of destructive
fishing processes, coral mining, marine pollution, and sedimentation.
Aspects such as weak legislation, poor enforcement, and strong incentives
have intensified the problem.
The Coral Reef Rehabilitation and Management Project (COREMAP) was
created to maintain the coral reef ecosystems and habitats, and this
study was conducted to identify and quantify the threat these practices
pose to the ecosystem.
Tools Used
Cost-Benefit Analysis
This analysis was used to estimate economic benefit to individuals and
loss to society. Calculations were dependent on coastal construction,
fisheries, and tourism potential. The cost was the loss to society in
terms of reductions in tourism, fisheries, and coastal protection due
to the depletion of the reef. The benefit was the total amount of net
earning by indiduals over the time period. Comparisons of values between
reefs and activities were facilitated by using cost or value per square
kilometer.
Predictive Modeling
This tool was used to determine the impact of current destructive activities
over a 25 year period. The assumption was made that the level of activity,
e.g. cyanide fishing or coral harvesting, would remain constant over
that time period. Researchers then calculated the level of the depletion
of the reefs over time based on the depletion rate. These calculations
were used to determine the long-term costs to society of the destructive
activities.
Outcomes
- Each of the five activities researched (poison fishing, blast fishing,
coral mining, sedimentation/pollution, and overfishing) showed a negative
net benefit to society over the projected time span.
- In some cases, the costs to society were 50 times higher than the
total benefits.
- Foreigners and foreign demand were largely responsible for reef
decline from cyanide fishing.
- Domestic demand was mostly responsible for reef decline from coral
mining, blast fishing, and overfishing.
- These results indicate an immediate need for government action.
- Depending on the issue, management needs to be a community-based
initiative, an integrated coastal zone management (ICZM) scheme, or
a form of centralized national governance.
Additional Resources
This project was conducted by Herman Cesar of Cesar Environmental Economics Consulting (CEEC) and the Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Free University, Amsterdam. He can be contacted at herman.cesar@ivm.vu.nl.
Articles and Books
Cesar, H. 1996. Economic
Analysis of Indonesian Coral Reefs. International Coral Reef
Initiative. Work in Progress.
Cesar, H., C.G. Lundin, S. Bettencourt, and J. Dixon. 1997. “Indonesian Coral Reefs: An Economic Analysis of a Precious but Threatened Resource.” Ambio. Volume 26, Number 6. Pages 345 to 350.
Web Sites
Indonesia’s Coral Reefs
A brief summary of key points related to Indonesian coral reefs. Included are descriptions of human interactions with the reef, anthropogenic threats, and coral reef management. From the Terangi Indonesian Coral Reef Foundation.
Reefs at Risk in Southeast Asia – Indonesia
This World Resources Institute article reviews the impact of both human and nonhuman factors on Indonesian coral reefs.