|
|
Benthic Habitat Mapping
Summary
Seabed-mapping technologies help generate benthic habitat maps that are useful for assessing the state of living resources. The key to successful application, however, lies in the translation of basic physical data of bottom characteristics into meaningful representations of benthic habitat quality. Benthic habitat is defined as submerged bottom environments with distinct physical, geochemical, and biological characteristics. Thus, the concept of habitat quality incorporates aspects of the physical substrate as they pertain to living organisms. Since marine benthos research often details organism-sediment interactions, many investigators equate the concept of benthic habitat with bottom sediment or substrate type. This is intuitive because the habitat occupied by benthic organisms is the sedimentary environment. However, this simplistic view has lead to a great deal of confusion as to the definition of habitat. This perspective equates habitat only with the seafloor topography plus sediment textural characteristics. These physical properties and dynamics of the bottom exist, in most cases, independent of biological processes. Substrate becomes habitat only when the intricacies of specified organisms are introduced. Habitat quality and structural indices are an important means for assigning a quality measure to different locations and times within or between habitats. The Chesapeake Bay Program provides an example of what is required to make the transition from seabed mapping to a benthic quality assessment. One of the goals of the Chesapeake Bay Program is to determine the percentage of Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries that have degraded infaunal community structure. To meet this goal, two basic types of data are needed:
When data from 1 and 2 are combined into a predictive model of infaunal conditions then benthic habitat quality can be assessed and mapped. The Benthic Indices page describes those that have been developed specifically to evaluate estuarine and marine benthic habitats. The Regional Monitoring case study describes an example of how these indices are incorporated in regional quality assessments for resource management. References Dauer, D.M., S.B. Weisberg, and J.A. Ranasinghe. 2000. "Relationships Between Benthic Community Condition, Water Quality, Sediment Quality, Nutrient Loads and Land Use Patterns in Chesapeake Bay." Estuaries. Volume 23. Pages 80 to 96. Diaz, R.J., M. Solan, and R.M. Valente. 2004. "A Review of Approaches for Classifying Benthic Habitats and Evaluating Habitat Quality." Journal of Environmental Management. Volume 73. Pages 165 to 181. Weisberg, S.B., J.A. Ranasinghe, D.M. Dauer, L.C. Schaffner, R.J. Diaz, and J.B. Frithsen. 1997. "An Estuarine Benthic Index of Biotic Integrity (B-IBI) for Chesapeake Bay." Estuaries. Volume 20. Pages 149 to 158.
|